The Role of Judges in Preventing Divorce Due to Domestic Violence: An Islamic Law Perspective (A Case Study at the South Jakarta Religious Court)
Abstract
The escalating prevalence of divorce cases attributable to domestic violence (KDRT) in Indonesia underscores the critical need for effective judicial intervention. This study examines the multifaceted role of judges at the South Jakarta Religious Court in preventing divorce resulting from domestic violence, evaluates the alignment of judicial practices with Islamic legal principles, and identifies the mechanisms employed in resolving such cases. Employing a qualitative case study methodology, primary data were gathered through in-depth interviews with a mediator judge and direct observations of mediation and court proceedings, complemented by secondary data from Islamic jurisprudence literature and official court documentation. The findings reveal that judges function as both law enforcers and mediators, systematically identifying domestic violence through evidentiary assessment and witness testimonies, and facilitating mediation using caucus techniques that allow victims to communicate without coercion. This judicial role aligns with the Islamic principles of justice (al-‘adl) and the protection of life (hifz al-nafs) within the maqāsid al-sharī‘ah framework. Although complete reconciliation remains rare, partial mediation outcomes demonstrate significant value in reducing future conflict.
References
Afrianty, D. (2018). Agents for change: Local women’s organizations and domestic violence in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 174(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17401024
Aibak, K. (2023). Implementation of maqāsid sharī‘ah in reform of case management of violence against women and children. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari’ah, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i1.20666
Alfitri. (2020). Protecting women from domestic violence: Islam, family law, and the state in Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 27(2), 273–314. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408
Ali, M., & Muliyono, A. (2023). Analysis of Islamic criminal law perspectives on domestic violence in Indonesia. Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice, 19(2), 114–122.
Arifin, H., Sudirman, L., Rahmawati, R., Basri, R., & Fikri, F. (2024). Efektivitas penerapan e-court perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Parepare. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8490–8502.
Astutik, L. H. Y., Nur, I., & Mashuri. (2022). Family expectation and poverty alleviation program: Approaches to population development, SDGs, and maqasid sharia. Justicia Islamica, 19(1), 1–20.
Auda, J. (2021). Re-envisioning Islamic scholarship: Maqasid methodology as a new approach. Claritas Books.
Backes, B., Wasim, A., & Wood, L. (2021). Prosecutorial use of victim video statements in domestic violence cases. Crime & Delinquency, 68(9), 1553–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211047540
BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2024). Jumlah perceraian menurut provinsi dan faktor penyebab perceraian. https://www.bps.go.id
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dzuhayatin, S. R. (2020). Gender glass ceiling in Indonesia: Manifestation, roots and theological breakthrough. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 58(1), 197–232.
Fotaki, M., & Pullen, A. (2023). Feminist theories and activist practices in organization studies. Organization Studies, 45(4), 523–544.
Hartawati, A., Beddu, S., & Susanti, E. (2022). Mediation model in increasing the success of divorce case resolution in Religious Courts. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, 4(1), 61–75.
Iqbal, M., & Hanafiah, M. (2023). Urgensi mediasi dalam penyelesaian syiqaq antara suami dan istri menurut fiqh Syafi’iyyah dan hukum positif. Posita, 1(2), 1–15.
Isgandarova, N. (2020). The role of Islam in preventing domestic violence towards Muslim women. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 5(2), 167–185.
Islam, M. J., Suzuki, M., Mazumder, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Challenges of implementing restorative justice for intimate partner violence: An Islamic perspective. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 40(1), 49–71.
Jasmine, A. S., Aslamiah, N., & Ramadhianisha, S. (2022). Kekerasan dalam rumah tangga sebagai alasan perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Bandung. Al-Mashlahah, 10(2), 223–238.
Johanes, J. (2023). Gender mainstreaming through guarantees of legal protection for women and children in Religious Court. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(2), 267–285.
Jones, B. (2022). Reaching out from the ocean: Women’s experiences navigating anti-domestic violence law in Aceh [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Melbourne.
Jones, B., & Aftab, A. (2023). Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An argument for domestic violence screening and exemption from compulsory mediation. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(2), 217–231.
Kamali, M. H. (2022). Maqasid al-shariah: The objectives of Islamic law. Islam101.net.
Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499.
Komnas Perempuan. (2024). Catatan tahunan: Refleksi pendokumentasian dan tren kasus kekerasan terhadap perempuan. https://komnasperempuan.go.id
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Maimun, M. (2022). The women’s rights in divorce and gender equality discourse in Madura. Samarah, 6(1), 1–25.
Maula, B. S., & Ariyanti, V. (2022). Justice negotiations for women: Divorce cases due to domestic violence in Religious Courts. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 20(1), 155–180.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Muttaqin, M. N., & Nur, I. (2022). Menelusuri jejak maqashid syari’ah dalam istimbath hukum Imam Hambali. Ahkam, 10(1), 143–168.
Norman, N. A., & Ruhullah, M. E. (2024). Exploring ethical dimensions of fiqh: The role of the soul in achieving maqāsid al-sharī‘ah. Al-Shajarah, 29(1), 47–77.
Nurjanah, S., & Nur, I. (2022). Gender fiqh: Mobilization of gender-responsive movement on social media. Ijtihad, 22(1), 1–20.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ramadhita, R., Maula, B. S., Isnanto, S. H., & Ariyanti, V. (2023). Gender inequality and judicial discretion in Muslims divorce of Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2206347.
Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.
Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Rohman, H. (2023). The concept of sulh and mediation in marriage conflict resolution in Religious Courts. Istinbath, 2(1), 1–25.
Sodiqin, A. (2021). Judges’ ijtihad in Indonesian Religious Courts: Balancing text and context. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, 13(2), 45–68.
Sukendar, S., Saifullah, M., Sulistiyanto, P., Rahman, L., & Ulamai, A. H. A. (2023). Women’s access to justice: Mediation for domestic violence victims in Central Java. Samarah, 7(1), 1–30.
Syukur, F. A., & Bagshaw, D. (2020). Gender, power, and court-annexed mediation in Indonesia. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 37(3), 277–291.
Taufiq, M., Nurhayati, E., & Hidayat, S. (2021). Ijtihad as a tool for legal development: Bridging classical jurisprudence and modern challenges. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 20(2), 78–95.
Tirtawening, R., & Maryam, S. (2023). Exploring efficacy: Divorce mediation in Indonesian Religious Courts. Lentera Hukum, 10(3), 331–364.
Turatmiyah, S., Annalisa, Y., & Novera, A. (2022). The effectiveness of mediation during COVID-19 as an effort to prevent divorce. Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(2), 175–192.
Wanto, D., Hidayat, R., & Repelita, R. (2021). Maqasid shariah’s change as theory: From classical to contemporary. Al-Istinbath, 6(2), 225–244.
Wilson-Evered, E., & Zeleznikow, J. (2021). Online family dispute resolution. Springer.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yuli, L. A. (2021). The use of ex officio to fulfill women’s post-divorce rights at Samarinda Religious Court. Ijtihad, 21(2), 135–154.
Zaidhatul, P. F., Kurniati, K., & Asni, A. (2023). Violence in the household (KDRT) perspective maqashid sharia. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(2), 191–207.
Anchassi, O. (2021). Status distinctions and sartorial difference: Slavery, sexual ethics, and the social logic of veiling in Islamic law. Islamic Law and Society, 28(3), 233–277.
.png)
